MARC RANDAZZA IS AGAINST THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHEN HE’s EXPOSED AS CORRUPT ATTORNEY

Source: unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com

Update: Corrupt attorney Marc Randazza believes that he “seek[s] to preserve the First Amendment and ensure the right to free speech, however small or persecuted the speaker.” However, he is more than willing to hide behind European privacy laws in order to protect himself from free speech.

The site CorruptRandazza.com has exposed today a threatening letter sent, in a seemingly “discreet” fashion, to an English publisher who had published pieces by journalists about the corruption. In the letter, the “free speech defender” Randazza wants pieces about him taken down.

Marc Randazza hired an English law firm known as “Cohen Davis Solicitors” to shamelessly (and frivolously) take down multiple legitimate opinion articles with “NOT FOR PUBLICATION” plastered at the head of the letter. The warning was probably given in the hope that the letter will not be made public.

Marc Randazza AGAINST free Speech

The articles Randazza wants deleted expose his past, including the many bar complaints and court rulings.

The opinion of the writer agrees with many others and the opinion of probably the majority of those in the legal profession that attorney Marc Randazza is corrupt.

Even judges said, hinted, or wrote that “tainted” Marc Randazza is corrupt, at the very least.

The Articles:

1. Corrupt Attorney Marc Randazza Represents Dwight Schar And Bella Collina’s Reputation

2. Why State Bar Of Nevada Allows Corrupt Marc Randazza To Practice Law?

3. Ethical Violations Against Dwight Schar’s Attorney Randazza

4. Why The Florida Bar Still Allows Dwight Schar’s Corrupt Attorney Marc Randazza To Practice Law

5. Crystal Cox Vs. Marc Randazza – Randazza Legal Group

6. Bribe Allegations: Integrity Complaint Filed Against Nev. Senator Justin Jones

7. Bribery, Gay Porn, And Copyright Trolls: The Rise And Fall Of Lawyer Marc Randazza

8. Lawyer Marc Randazza Of Randazza Legal Group And Infowars Has Had His Law License Suspended In Nevada

9. Connecticut Judge: Attorney Marc Randazza Is Too Unethical To Represent Alex Jones

10. Connecticut Judge: Attorney Marc Randazza Is Too Unethical To Represent Alex Jones

11. Bribery, Gay Porn, And Copyright Trolls: The Rise And Fall Of Lawyer Marc Randazza

12. Dwight Schar, Ryan Homes, Neo-Nazis, Alex Jones, Porn and Corrupt Attorney Randazza

13. Marc Randazza, fighting for Nazis, satanists, and unapologetic trolls

Who Is Attorney Marc Randazza (Randazza Legal Group)?

Marc Randazza is a “tainted” attorney who wasn’t good enough to represent even the InfoWars founder and conspiracy theorist, Alex Jones. Major news publications took issue with Randazza’s unique approach to the law, especially when it came to his dealings with pornography and notorious alt-right figures and neo-Nazis.

Randazza will try to argue that he is not corrupt. “The allegation of him being corrupt is pure fabrication,” states the letter. The Merriam Webster definition of corrupt is “dishonest or illegal behavior.” By saying that Randazza is corrupt, no one is accusing him of a crime, necessarily. They are simply saying that he is dishonest.

In a letter sent to a publisher, Randazza’s attorneys threatened to sue the company for defamation. However, almost nowhere in the letter were any of the facts published in the pieces disputed. Instead, it simply quotes large portions of text without saying why they were defamatory.

Here are the links that Randazza believes are defamatory. However, he has not proven them in court as defamation. It is up to the reader to decide whether or not these stories are true.

• lawyer Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and InfoWars has had his law license SUSPENDED in Nevada

• http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/

• Bribe Allegations: Integrity Complaint Filed Against Nev. Senator Justin Jones

• Bribery, gay porn, and copyright trolls: The rise and fall of lawyer Marc Randazza

• Connecticut Judge: Attorney Marc Randazza Is Too Unethical To Represent Alex Jones

Randazza also claims that pieces published by Ars Technica are part of the defamation, but these pieces were not proven in an American court to be defamatory. At best, all the accusations are simply unproven claims.

Dwight Schar’s Attorney Randazza Manipulates The Truth

Randazza selected two pieces from the linked stories and claimed they were defamatory to him. He also tried to state that by linking to these stories, publishers were responsible for the content of the links.

There is no record anywhere of Randazza initiating a lawsuit against HuffPost or Ars Technica. There is also no record of HuffPost or Ars Technica settling with Marc Randazza outside of court. And of course, there is no record of Randazza winning a lawsuit against either of these media outlets.

Randazza must think he is the judge and jury in the United States, randomly assuming that pieces published in major publications as fact are defamation and false. The legal definition of defamation is “the act of making untrue statements about another which damages his/her reputation.” In order for Randazza to say that something is defamation, he must prove it to be untrue. Nowhere in the document does he do so.

Randazza’s Definition of “Corrupt” is…. Corrupted

Instead, Randazza argues that he is “not corrupt or dishonest.” The letter stated, “He has not guilty of ‘serious misconduct’ in his legal practice.” [sic].

“The allegation of him being corrupt is pure fabrication,” states the letter. The Merriam Webster definition of corrupt is “dishonest or illegal behavior.” By saying that Randazza is corrupt, no one is accusing him of a crime, necessarily. They are simply saying that he is dishonest.

Randazza was issued a public reprimand by The Florida Bar on Sept. 3, 2020 DISCIPLINE CASE #201500718 against Marc Randazza. The reprimand was related to his ethical violations in Nevada, where Randazza, as a porn attorney, was sued by the State Bar of Nevada on nine charges of violations.

On January 14, 2019, the Arizona State Bar issued a public reprimand and a suspension based upon some of the misconduct that took place in Nevada. A new disciplinary case was opened in Arizona and California based upon further information and documentation of alleged misconduct by Randazza, to include allegedly lying in court documents related to the Alex Jones case in Connecticut. However, beyond the reciprocal disciplinary proceedings, Randazza was not charged with any new violations and the Arizona suspension was not put into effect.

On May 2, 2019, in the Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County, Massachusetts, in a state bar disciplinary proceeding styled In re: Mark John Randazza, Case No. BD-2018-110, a hearing was conducted, which included an additional alleged ethical violation that the bar counsel claimed the State Bar of Nevada ignored. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court did not find this additional ethical violation existed and issued a stayed suspension of the same term as Nevada. The Florida Supreme Court conducted a similar reciprocal disciplinary proceeding; it found no aggravating factors, with the Referee finding that there was “no clear and convincing evidence to suggest that anything [Randazza] may have done on behalf of his other clients was actually adverse to” his complaining clients. Thus, Randazza was given a reprimand and one year probation in Florida.